Indirect materials include <u>salt and pepper.</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
What are indirect materials ?
- Indirect materials are goods that, while part of the overall manufacturing process, are not integrated into the final product.
- For example, disposable gloves, personal protective equipment, tape, etc., may be essential to a production line, but they are not part of the actual product created on that line.
- When cost savings take priority, it’s important to control spending and compliance by using a unified source-to-pay (S2P) platform for indirect materials.
- Among S2P platforms, cloud-native ones offer the best functionality: they are easy to set up, deploy, learn and use, and they offer real-time, end-to-end visibility.
- Unlike indirect materials, direct materials are components that are integrated into a manufactured product.
- For example, chips in a mobile phone are direct materials in mobile phone production.
To know more about indirect materials, refer:
brainly.com/question/14896549
#SPJ4
Answer:
r= 3
Explanation:
Due that the level price does not changed, the first thing that you have to do to find the equilibrium is put the two equations with an equal
Money demand =Supply of money
2,200 – 200 r= 2,000
Now you have to find the value of r and you have to clear the formula and first you have to:
2,800- 2,200 = 200r
Now that you have the number together you have to apply the operation
600 = 200r
As the 200 is multiplying the r you have to pass the 200 to divided the 600
r= (600/200)
r= 3%
The interest rate is 3%
Explanation:
See the images for answer....
I AM NOT FROM U.S.A I AM FROM INDIA
There are three choices the caller's H.323 proxy server, the receiver's H.323 proxy server and the receiver directly but none of these choices are correct. So the answer in this question will be none of the above. It is hard to know where you would send the invite message so the answer is NONE.
International business research is only beginning to develop theory and evidence highlighting the importance of supranational regional institutions to explain firm internationalization. In this context, we offer new theory and evidence regarding the effect of a region's "institutional complexity" on foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises (MNEs). We define a region's institutional complexity using two components, regional institutional diversity and number of countries. We explore the unique relationships of both components with MNEs' decisions to internationalize into countries within the region. Drawing on semiglobalization and regionalization research and institutional theory, we posit an inverted U-shaped relationship between a region's institutional diversity and MNE internationalization: extremely low or high regional institutional diversity has negative effects on internationalization, but moderate diversity has a positive effect on internationalization. Larger numbers of countries within the region reduces MNE internationalization in a linear fashion. We find support for these predicted relationships in multilevel analyses of 698 Japanese MNEs operating in 49 countries within 9 regions. Regional institutional complexity is both a challenge and an opportunity for MNEs seeking advantages through the aggregation and arbitrage of individual country factors.