The result of the corporation is most likely trademark infringement.
When a trademark or service mark is used without authorization on or in connection with products and/or services in a way that can cause confusion, deception, or mistake about the source of the goods and/or services, this is referred to as trademark infringement.
A trademark owner who believes their mark is being used improperly may, depending on the circumstances, bring a civil action (i.e., a lawsuit) for trademark infringement in either a state or a federal court. However, trademark owners typically opt to bring an infringement claim before a federal court. Even if the plaintiff files in state court, the defendant may be able to have the case "removed" to federal court.
Learn more about trade mark infringement at
brainly.com/question/28098520?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
being open and honest builds a sense of self-worth. It is about being moral, truthful to yourself and with others.
Explanation:
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, goodwill refers to the additional value that an organisation have from its identifiable assets due to its operations over a period of time.
In other words, it can be defined as an intangible asset which an organisation creates over a period of time while establishing the brand image. These assets are not depreciated but are tested for impairment every year. For example brands like apple, Reebok and McDonald have high goodwill in the market which attracts customers towards them
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
<span>The answer is 'scanning the environment'.
Environmental scanning is a process that systematically surveys and interprets relevant data to identify external opportunities and threats.</span>