The income effect is the change in the demand of the goods and services as an result of the change of the The increased voluntary income of the consumer. Hense, the best option that describes the income effect is;The increased income earned by suppliers because of high prices. :)
Explanation:
<u>To </u><u>upgrade </u><u>HDI </u><u>of </u><u>Nepal </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>following </u><u>measures </u><u>must </u><u>be </u><u>implemented </u><u>:</u>
- The health condition of the people should be improved.
- Country should attract foreign investment and technologies to bring positive changes in the sectors of human development.
- The level of education should be increased by increasing the education opportunities.
- The per capita income should be increased by enlarging employment opportunities.
- The Local means and resources should be utilized properly.
Hope I helped!
Best regards!
A tuition difference between in-state and out of state students is an example of: How states make exceptions to the privileges and immunities clause.
<h3><u>What is in-state vs. out-of-state tuition?</u></h3>
The privileges and immunities clause emphasizes that a state cannot discriminatorily treat residents of other states. People from one state need to have the same rights in all of them. This is refuted by the tuition differential between in-state and out-of-state students.
- A student who resides permanently in the state where their university is situated is said to be paying in-state tuition. The cost that out-of-state students, including those from abroad, pay to attend a public state institution is referred to as out-of-state tuition.
- Typically, in-state tuition is far less expensive than out-of-state tuition.
- For instance, the School of Undergraduate Studies at The University of Texas at Austin costs residents of the state $5,624 for 12 or more credits. Out-of-state students pay $19,464 for the same courses, which is a difference of approximately $14,000.
To view more about state, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13487755
#SPJ4
I’m not entirely sure, but since no one has answered yet, I’d go with C. It seems to relate most to what the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans disagreed on most.
Answer:
The framers of the Constitution wanted to create a third branch of the government, equal to the others. This is the federal judiciary. At the same time, they feared overreaching federal power, so they limited the power, or jurisdiction, of the federal courts. This has led to a dual court system, with each having its own key role.
Explanation:
