Write a literal corresponding to the floating point value one-and-a-half.

1 answer:

7 0

<span>1.5 In C or C++, a floating point literal is nothing more than a sequence of decimal digits with either or both an decimal point, or an exponent with optionally a type specifier. The value could be any of the following: 1.5, 1.5e0, 0.15e1, 15e-1, etc.</span>

You might be interested in

Select from the drop-down menu to correctly complete the statement.

Usimov [2.4K]

The true statement is that: if you cannot get from one term to the next by adding or multiplying by a constant value, the sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric

<h3>How to determine the true statement</h3>

A progression can either be arithmetic, geometric or neither.

When the progression has a common difference (gotten by addition), then the progression is arithmetic
When the progression has a common ratio (gotten by multiplication), then the progression is geometric

If the above are not true, then the sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric

Read more about sequence at:

brainly.com/question/6561461

6 0

2 years ago

Does the following represent a function? <br> f = [ (3, -1), (2, 5), (4, -6), (3, 4), (5, -8) ]

ella [17]

Answer:

Not a function

Since x= produces y- -1 and y=-4, the relation (3,-1),(2,5),(4,-6),(3,4),(5,-8) is not a function.

7 0

2 years ago

I need help with Geometry

zepelin [54]

Answer:

The answer is 180 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

The rotation that maps one side to an adjacent side is 360°/6 = 60°. This is the least rotation that plots the regular hexagon to the aforementioned. In the least whole number of these minimum rotations, such as three 60° rotations to make 180°, will retain the hexagon identical.

Please mark me brainliest and have a awesome day! :D

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the product (2t+1) (t-4)

____ [38]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(2t+1)(t-4)

= 2t^2 - 8t + t - 4

= 27^2 - 7t - 4

3 0

3 years ago

Hi can someone help me with the last two sets of shapes? Thank you so much! -Jenn

SOVA2 [1]

You are correct there's at least one obtuse angle

8 0

3 years ago