Answer:
156 degree
Step-by-step explanation:
supplementary angle add up to 180 degree
180 - 24
= 156
<span>for the first part, realize that the hour and minute hands are moving at different rates; in one hour, the minute hands moves all the way around the face of the clock, and thus moves a total of 360 degrees or 2 pi radians; the hour hand moves only 1/12 away around the clock, so covers only 30 degrees or Pi/6 radians.
Now, the LINEAR distance traveled by the tip of each hand is also determined by the length of the hand. In the case of the minute hand, it sweeps out a circle of radius 10 cm, so traces out a circle of radius 10 cm. Since the circumference of a circle is 2*pi*r, the minute hand (remember it made one complete cycle) covers a distance of 2*pi*10cm=20 Pi cm
The hour hand covers only 1/12 a circle, but that circle is only 6 cm in radius, so the distance traveled by the tip of the minute hand is:
1/12 *[2 *pi*r]=1/12*[12*pi]=pi
so the difference is 19pi
for the last part, you should draw a diagram of the two hands, the minute hand is 10 cm in length, the hour hand is 6 cm in length, and they are 30 degrees apart...from that drawing, see if you can figure out the remaining leg of the triangle you can form from them
good luck</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
the constant of proportionality is 0.2 and it is a proportional relationship
Step-by-step explanation:
2 divided by 10 is 0.2
1 divided by 5 is 0.2
they have the same answer so they are proportional
since they have the answer 0.2 it
is there constant of proportionality
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Let
be the volumes of the smaller and bigger cylinder.
The formula for the volume of a cylinder is given by :

As the two triangles are similar, the cube of their ratio would equal the ratio of their volume i.e.

So, the volume of the smaller cylinder is equal to
.
Answer:
B the range, the x- and y-intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
the domain stays the same : all values of x are possible out of the interval (-infinity, +infinity).
but the range changes, as for the original function y could only have positive values - even for negative x.
the new function has a first term (with b) that can get very small for negative x, and then a subtraction of 2 makes the result negative.
the y-intercept (x=0) of the original function is simply y=1, as b⁰=1.
the y-intercept of the new function is definitely different, because the first term 3×(b¹) is larger than 3, because b is larger than 1. and a subtraction of 2 leads to a result larger than 1, which is different to 1.
the original function has no x-intercept (y=0), as this would happen only for x = -infinity. and that is not a valid value.
the new function has an x-intercept, because the y-values (range) go from negative to positive numbers. any continuous function like this must therefore have an x-intercept (again, y = the function result = 0)



