Because the united states believed that it was its well... "destiny" to go out in the world or at least west, and take what ever land was there, as the united states was the great liberator for the people who wanted to be free- so it was its destiny to grow its borders, anyways, this made adapting new states into the union almost policy and the united states was eager to add more land and territory to its borders.
I believe the answer is: <span> they impede scientific progress
The scientific findings that derived from a research often would be used as a basis for other research in the future. This method allow our scientific development to keep moving forward.
</span><span>When a research knowingly falsified data, the basis for future scientific research is already wrong to begin with and this would stunt the development.</span>
He should be charged with the death penalty because he was not a threat to anyone he was just going to the store but if he was carrying a bomb or a weapon or something that was dangerous then he would have been able to shot him. murder is still murder even if it is committed by a cop.
<span>According to Gordon Allport, intergroup contact is likely to reduce prejudice when group members engage in competitive tasks. This theory makes sense, when people have to compete for something in their home life or work life, they tend to think of things being more fair when there is a competition held to achieve the winning. There is so many prejudice in the work environment now-a-days that it is hard to have employees understand why decisions are rightfully made. </span>
