All categories

4 years ago

What is the measurement of angle 3?

Mathematics

1 answer:

frez [133]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

angle 3 is also (2x-5) degree

if you are wanting the correct number ...i honestly don't know

yet i hope this answer helps

You might be interested in

What's the Error? Explain the error. Find the correct solution.<br>19 + (-31) = 12

Alex

Answer:

The answer is incorrect because 12 should be negative not positive.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 19 + -31 = - 12

2. Twelve is negative because if you were to start off at -31 and add 19 the answer would remain negative since -31 in a sense is "bigger" than 19. You would need more of a positive number to make -31 positive such as 40.

40+ -31 = 9

5 0

3 years ago

What does a irrational number look like

julia-pushkina [17]

A irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. That's it.

For examples (in increasing order of difficulty)

1 is a rational number because it is 1/1

0.75 is a rational number because it is equal to 3/4

2.333... (infinite number of digits, all equal to three) is rational because it is equal to 7/3.

sqrt(2) is not a rational number. This is not completely trivial to show but there are some relatively simple proofs of this fact. It's been known since the greek.

pi is irrational. This is much more complicated and is a result from 19th century.

As you see, there is absolutely no mention of the digits in the definition or in the proofs I presented.

Now the result that you probably hear about and wanted to remember (slightly incorrectly) is that a number is rational if and only if its decimal expansion is eventually periodic. What does it mean ?

Take, 5/700 and write it in decimal expansion. It is 0.0057142857142857.. As you can see the pattern "571428" is repeating in the the digits. That's what it means to have an eventually periodic decimal expansion. The length of the pattern can be anything, but as long as there is a repeating pattern, the number is rational and vice versa.

As a consequence, sqrt(2) does not have a periodic decimal expansion. So it has an infinite number of digits but moreover, the digits do not form any easy repeating pattern.

5 0

2 years ago

In Youngtown the population reach 4420 people in 1993 in 1998 there were 5600 residents what was toe population in the year 2000

dybincka [34]

So, let's find the rates:
5 years = 1180 people
5n = 1180
n = 236
236*2 = 472
5600 + 472 = 6072
6072 people

8 0

3 years ago

Seiji and Gavin both worked hard over the summer. Together they earned a total of $450. Gavin earned $30 more than seiji.

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

(a) $s+g=450\\g=s+30$

(b) The graph is shown below.

(c) Seiji earned $ 210 and Gavin earned $ 240.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Sum of earnings of Seiji and Gavin = $ 450

Gavin earns $ 30 more that that of Seiji.

(a)

So, as per question, if s and g are the amounts earned by Seiji and Gavin respectively, then;

$s+g=450\\g=s+30$

(b)

The graph is plotted using the x and y intercepts of each line.

For the line, $s+g=450$ , the x intercept is at $g=0$ . So, x intercept is (450,0). Similarly, the y intercept is when s=0, which is (0,450). Draw a line passing through these two points. The red line represents $s+g=450$ .

We follow the same process to plot the next line. The x intercept is at (-30,0) and y intercept is at (0,30). Draw a line passing through these two points. The blue line represents $g=s+30$ .

The graph is shown below.

(c)

From the graph, the point of intersection of the two lines gives the earnings of each of the persons.

The $x$ value of the point of intersection is the earning of Seiji which is $ 210 and the $y$ value is the earning of Gavin which is $ 240 as shown in the graph.

Therefore, Seiji earned $ 210 and Gavin earned $ 240.

3 0

3 years ago

Rayshawn has a certain amount of money if he spends $20 then he has 1/3 of the original amount how much money did Rayshawn have

erik [133]

Answer:

Rayshawn originally had $30.

Step-by-step explanation:

i) Rayshawn has a certain amount of money. Let us say this amount is $x.

ii) Rayshawn spends $20 which means that he is left with $(x - 20)

iii) it is also given that amount of money left after spending $20 is $\dfrac{1}{3}$ of the original amount, $x, the amount remaining is $\dfrac{\$x}{3}$ .

iv) from the information given in ii) and iii) we get

$(x - 20) = $\dfrac{\$x}{3}$ , Therefore we get 3x - 60 = x , therefore 2x = 60,

Therefore x = $30. Rayshawn originally had $30.

7 0

3 years ago