Credible sources should explicitly identify the purpose or intent of the information included in a source.

2 answers:

6 0

Yes, I think that identifying the purpose would increase the credibility of the source, so if we understand the "should" here as "would be good if, is recommended" - then this statement is true.

Including the intent of the information in the source will help place the information in a wider context - and often the context is necessary to fully understand the content of a source.

LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is true.

It is true that credible sources should explicitly identify the purpose or intent of the information included in a source.

Otherwise, researchers or journalists would question the authenticity of the source. When doing research, it is very important to have enough credible sources to support the arguments of our work. So researchers need to double-check the validity of the information, make comparisons if necessary, that can prove the data included in the research is correct.

You might be interested in

Which best defines a civilization

mr_godi [17]

C
because civilization has to do with a very organized Society

5 0

3 years ago

Anu ang modular Distance Learning?

laiz [17]

Answer:

ayan daw ung meaning bhie

3 0

2 years ago

How did Europeans affect Africa during the 1800s? How did Africans respond in the 1900s?

astra-53 [7]

1>>In the 1800s Europeans occupied Africa
2>>In the 1900s the Aricans liberated their land from such occupations.

hope this helps

remember if you ever need anything or a question answered feel free to post it on my profile or you can message me

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What law placed taxes on tea, paper, glass, and coloring for paint?

Olegator [25]

Answer:

Townshed act/Townshed Duties

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

How does research support the formation of ideas,claims and opinions on a specific subject

Softa [21]

Answer:

Research is a process of generating new knowledge about a specific subject by acquiring new information, analyzing it and putting it into the framework of existing knowledge in order to make new conclusions.

Let us take as an example the salient issue of electronic cigarettes. Being on the market in many countries for several years now, e-cigarettes have both their supporters and opposers. Some people claim that e-cigarettes is a good alternative to smoking tobacco and while they can be harmful they are less harmful than tobacco. Some people share an opinion that e-cigarettes are dangerous and should be banned.

Only research can educate both of these opinions with validated scientific outcomes. That is why so many institutions are currently running extensive research on the impact of e-cigarettes on human health. Until robust scientific data is collected, which takes a lot of time with subjects that are expected to have a long-term effect on human health, ideas in favor or against will prevail the agenda on this subject. Moreover, the lack of research can result in fear mongering ideas about e-cigarettes, or opposite to that, fashion to use e-cigarettes among people who were not smoking tobacco before.

4 0

3 years ago