Answer:
- Freedom from the influence of the Great Britain
They no longer had to put up with the pressure of having to elect officials that is wanted by the Great Britain. They can elect someone who can genuinely care for the country's development.
- Ability to forms their own laws that are suitable to their own culture
some of the laws that made during the colonization designed to conformed to western principles / philosophy. Making own their constitution means that India no longer have to do this.
- Ability to form an alliance outside of Great Britain's social circle.
Such as Russia and China for example. They won't be able to form an alliance with them if they are still under the British influence.
- Create the economy that benefit Indian people
Under British's rule, the trades laws that passed will most likely benefit the Great Britain rather than the Indian people. They will decide which products gets the subsidy and how much the products they can export. But this commodities might not be popular In Indian market.
Answer:
Socratic Method
Explanation:
According to my research on different methods of critical thinking, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the professor is using the Socratic Method. This method focuses itself on a form of cooperative argument between two individuals, in which one asks and the other answers, and vice versa.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Then it wouldn't be a essay
Answer:
According to the early human migration patterns they moved for about two to three miles per generation.
Explanation:
First of all, we need to contextualize here to understand why humans only moved as far as three miles per generation. Now, to start I would like to point out something. Early human groups weren't a settled group of civilizations, they were nomads and collectors, in the best cases they started to develop crop farming methods but that was really unlikely. So they depended almost solely on gathering and hunting. Thus, they weren't really able to get enough resources to perform long trips. They followed animal groups to hunt them down and that was also a reason to only move in small distances. Because in that time animals had plenty of places to move in the same areas. Also because if they had enough resources in a single place there was no real reason to leave. But that changed when settlements and civilizations developed. Rivalry for resources was a major migration factor.
Answer:
b
Explanation: i just had this