Answer:
The answer is 27 hours
Explanation:
Solution
The Comparative advantage depends on production of the lower opportunity cost
The opportunity cost of a production is =maximum production of other good /maximum production of the good
Now,
The opportunity cost of hot dog bun for town A =10/4=2.5
Thus,
The opportunity cost of hot dog bun for town B=6/10=0.6
So,
The town B has a comparative advantage in hot dog buns and A in sausages
Town A will produce-only sausages and it will take the time of
time in hours =total required a quantity of the good /number of products in an hour
Now,
The time for Town A for sausages=120/10=12 hours
The time for Town B for hot dog buns=120/8=15 hours
Therefore, The total time =12+15=27 hours.
Answer:
Equilibrium price will DECREASE and equilibrium quantity will INCREASE
Explanation:
Answer:
Letter a is correct. <u>Audience analysis.</u>
Explanation:
Audience analysis is the preparation stage for a presentation, and is relevant for audience evaluation and definition so that communication is appropriately addressed to them.
Audience definition is important for the direction of the presentation, so you can create an engaging presentation that will create the intended understanding of the presenter and positively impact the audience. For this it is necessary to know some characteristics of the public, such as age group, level of knowledge of the subject, interest, culture and others, in order to trace the ideal profile and the direction to occur effectively.
Answer:
14.58%
Explanation:
WACC = weight of equity x cost of equity + weight of debt x cost of debt x (1 - tax rate) + weight of preferred equity x dividend yield
According to the capital asset price model: Expected rate of return = risk free + beta x (market rate of return - risk free rate of return)
r= 3% + 1.1 x 8 = 11.8
equity = 0.4 x 11.8% = 4.72
d = 0.4 x 5 x (1 -0.21) = 1.58
p = 0.2 x 6 = 1.2
11.8 + 1.58 + 1.2 =
Answer:
c. The medical center will prevail based upon the written contract
Explanation:
Since they later signed a written contract where it is stated in paper and has their signature that the medical center could not assure nor take any responsibilities for the birth of a kid without any medical, mental or physical defects the medical center has the upperhand on the court, as well as they did in Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center that promised a perfect designed baby, the Scalsi decided for invitro fertilization because of the wife´s family medical history and tendency to autism, and they ended up with a baby with autism, so they sue the New York University Medical center, but the court sided with the NYUMC because of the written contract where it stated that they couldn´t assure the baby to be born without any medica, mental or physical defects.
