1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
5

7. Research has demonstrated that persons unable to make bail are more likely to

Law
2 answers:
ArbitrLikvidat [17]3 years ago
5 0
The answer to this question is d
ira [324]3 years ago
4 0
The answer would be “D” and possibly more outcomes
You might be interested in
1. What is the primary objective of the California legal settlement?
vitfil [10]

Answer:

1.) End long term solitary confinement in SHU's  

2.) They are labeled as a threat to the rest of the prison. They also broke prison rules and therefore it was deemed necessary to punish them.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which option is the correct assumption of life course theory?
Agata [3.3K]
The answer should be C because casual factores are classified as unplanned. If they are unplanned, they can happen at random. People grow up in different situations and are exposed to different things.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are wealthy people essential in the economy?
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

To pay those of us with less money

Explanation:

Wealthy people hire people with less money than them to do things and when you have a job or do something for them they pay you in return. Imagine a very wealthy person owns a successful business, they can't clean they store, manage stocks(stonks), and do everything else by themselves and that's where the people who need money come in. They pay us to work for them and they still get money back from the business. That's what rich people are for to pay those of us who need money, making them a very essential part of the economy.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The ___________________ rule demands that any items or evidence gathered during an illegal search of a person's private property
kondaur [170]

Answer:

The exclusionary rule

Explanation:

the decision in Mappy v. Ohio declared that evidence that is obtained through an illegal search or seizure can not be used as evidence and must be excluded. This means that if an officer finds evidence of a crime on you but does not announce Miranda rights before searching you, then the evidence found from your crime can not be used against you in a court.

4 0
2 years ago
WILL GIVE YOU BRANLIEST
Volgvan

Answer:

B!!!!!

Explanation:

The Court most recently cited Terry v. Ohio in Arizona v. Johnson. In that 2009 case, the Court ruled 9–0 in favor of further expanding Terry, granting police the ability to frisk an individual in a stopped vehicle if there is reasonable suspicion to believe the individual is armed and dangerous.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Give two reasons why critics argue reporters should not be protected by shield laws
    11·1 answer
  • Explain why someone may still be tracked by family members DNA profile even though they will not be an exact match
    5·1 answer
  • How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
    8·2 answers
  • What led to the case being reopened?
    8·2 answers
  • Government:
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the professional field of paralegals develop?
    10·2 answers
  • A factor in competence NOT mentioned by Pope and Vasquez
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups of people are disproportionately represented in the segregated prison population?
    15·1 answer
  • In Historical Archetypes and Mythology, what is Call to Adventure?
    13·1 answer
  • What California law did the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturn?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!