How did the plague weaken the system of feudalism in Europe?

1 answer:

8 0

The system of feudalism needed a lot of workers, who were tied to the land, and had to deliver a part of their harvest to their lords. The farmers generally had a poor life and struggled to make enough both for themselves and for the lords, but the lords benefited from this, as they had many farmers paying them a part of their harvest

Before the plague, the land was scarce, but people plenty, which meant that the farmers could not set conditions on their work. After the plague the number of farmers decreased, and there was a lot of work needed, so the farmers could search for a different place to work, if the feudal lords were demanding too much,.

You might be interested in

What do meticulous mean?

nydimaria [60]

meticulous mean careful and precise

5 0

3 years ago

By using first-person narrative and including many details, which critical goal does Douglass achieve in his autobiography?

Serga [27]

By using first-person narrative and including many details, which critical goal does Douglass achieve in his autobiography? ... B. Slaves had to know that their owners controlled every aspect of their lives.

5 0

3 years ago

Who had appointed himself "emperor for life" after the election of 1804 humanities?

Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

Napoleon Bonaparte

Explanation:

Napoleon Bonaparte became the French Emperor in the year 1804 after the French Senate supported his claim to be the Emperor. He is known for his expeditions and victories over major European rivals of that time. He first took over the France in 1799 after the coup and was official called the Emperor in 1804 after the elections. It is when he called or declared himself 'Emperor for Life'.

5 0

3 years ago

The quote is takin from the 13 amendment

Gala2k [10]

Answer:

a statement that identifies the 13 amendment is in article 1 section 8 of the consitution.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

If an i/o psychologist is employed by a company that appears to be discriminating against hispanics, is it ethical for her to st

serg [7]

Her continued presence is morally acceptable in order to eradicate discrimination and promote equality. She has an ethical obligation to receive respect, be treated equally to other employees in the organization, and be free from harassment.

Discriminating against Hispanics in America is wrong for everyone, not just Hispanics. Professionals also have their own codes of ethics. It is moral to continue the employee's employment if she has a reasonable reason to think that by doing so, she can improve her behavior.

The action is ethical if the employee thinks she can prove it to the AG, EEOC, or law enforcement (as necessary) with enough documentation of the behavior. It might be ethical or it might not, depending on the facts, if the employee is facing a personal dilemma regarding her employability and behavior.

To learn more about ethical obligation here,

brainly.com/question/27824491

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago