Answer:
A. average total cost is rising.
Explanation:
Whenever marginal cost is more than average cost it means it costs more to produce a unit now compared to the average cost of the previous units. Lets assume that a company produces 3 units of a good.
The first unit costs $1
The second unit costs $2
The third unit costs $3.
The average cost is (1+2+3)/3=2
Now if the marginal cost for producing a unit is more than the average cost for example if the marginal cost is 4, then this will mean that average total cost is rising. we can mathematically check this.
The first unit costs $1
The second unit costs $2
The third unit costs $3.
The fourth unit costs $4
Average cost= (1+2+3+4)/4=10/4=2.5
Here we see that the average cost increased from 2 to 2.5 because marginal cost was greater than average cost.
Answer:
1. This is true.
The Germans will pay a higher price for tuna because the tariff will increase the price of imported tuna and the reduction in completion with the local producers will lead to higher prices as the local producers take up their price.
2. This is true.
German producers no longer have to compete as much with imported tuna which was cheaper. They will therefore be able to raise their prices.
3. This statement is false.
The world price of Tuna DOES NOT increase because the tariff is only applicable in Germany. Other parts of the world will trade tuna as before. This is what is assumed.
4. This statement is true.
If Vietnam was exporting tuna to Germany, they will become worse off because they will see a decline in demand for their tuna on account of the tariffs making the tuna more expensive.
5. This is false.
Vietnamese tuna consumers will still pay the same price to get tuna because Vietnam produces the tuna. It is Vietnam's producers that will suffer not the consumers.
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
Answer:
A) No, it is preferable to compare the fund against the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, Far East (EAFE) Index because it covers international securities.
Explanation:
As It is important that a specific mutual fund should be compared against the benchmark i.e. considered appropriate. The performance of the international fund should also be compared against the foreign stock index like EAFE index
So in this way the agent should be responded to the current situation
Therefore the option a is correct
I'm pretty sure that cotton production, dye production, and metal production etc. <span>are associated with making a pair of jeans if we talk about primary. Secondary is about receiving materials for jeans' production.</span>
