Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Globalization is a huge danger to local cultures because it can rob them of their identify by imposing a fit-for-all culture known all over the world.
Local cultures prosper because they are local and unique, far away from the global influence. Globalization brings people together but it also makes them all look alike because they are exposed to the same influences, in culture, business or politics. Some local tradition may become too old fashioned for many to be still followed and they may disappear, especially if the young people reject them because they don't seem attractive any longer. To prevent local culture, some rituals have to be maintained and pass over to the next generation, globalization jeopardizes this process and some local cultures may become extinct in the end.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Antoine Lavoisier is the scientist that said that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
<h3>Who was Antoine Lavoisier?</h3>
This is the name of the scientist who was a French Nobleman as well as a chemist. He was one of the persons that was central to the Chemical revolution that took place in the European continent. His discovery and science has a lot of influence on modern science and biology today.
Hence we can say that Antoine Lavoisier is the scientist that said that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
Read more on Antoine Lavoisier here: brainly.com/question/4345117
#SPJ1
The second Amendment: the right to bear arms
Explanation:
I believe the second amendment should be abolished. I believe it should be abolished because, The second amendment is very dangerous. It is very dangerous if it is in the wrong arms. Only though some countries allow people “to bear arms” It’s not safe. That is why I think the Second Amendment should be removed.
