Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
The author is making a cultural allusion, therefore comparing the character to something in our present day culture. I hope this will guide you towards the right answer.
The answer you are looking for is a "compromise". Both sides will give something up so they are equal in the end giving them a compromise
Answer: the colonists felt like the government had to much power
Explanation: they had power over everything colonists had not say in anything
When an adult is going through a neurocognitive disorder, the first sign that is usually noticed is <u>memory problems.</u>
<h3>What does a neurocognitive disorder bring?</h3>
It leads to poorer cognitive functioning in the person affected such as problems with memory and attention retention.
The first sign of this is usually memory loss because it is one of the most heavily affected areas when a person suffers cognitive issues.
Find out more on neurocognitive disorders at brainly.com/question/4415940.
