1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bumek [7]
3 years ago
13

Was apartheid a product of a democratic system of government? explain.

History
1 answer:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
5 0
By definition, an apartheid is defined as the act of segregating races in which it most especially takes place in the African countries starting the second half of the 20th century. Based on my opinion, the policy does not employ the principles of democracy because the people were not given the right to fair treatment and equality regardless of race and culture.
You might be interested in
What did people in Africa look forward to after the Great Liberation?
photoshop1234 [79]
Nothing literally nothing
5 0
3 years ago
CAn somebody help me???
ch4aika [34]

Answer:

i think it is d.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the case of Morse v. Frederick important? How does it apply to the question of when schools should be able to limit stud
Helen [10]

Answer: In Morse v. Frederick, the majority acknowledged that the Constitution affords lesser protections to certain types of student speech at school or at school-supervised events. ... As such, the state had an "important" if not "compelling" interest in prohibiting/punishing such student speech.

Explanation:

:)

5 0
3 years ago
What was one characteristic that native americans and europeans held in common in the 1490s?
Margarita [4]

<u><em>Native Americans</em></u> and <u><em>Europeans</em></u> were great explorers in the 1490's. <em>Europeans</em> adventurers came to a continent that was an unknown place to them. They saw it as an entirely new territory, with new species to discover. They met new people with surprising ways of living and a totally new culture and beliefs. <u><em>Native Americans</em></u> also arrived at different times, over several thousands of years. They traveled from Asia on foot or by boat, crossing the Bering Strait. Their explorations took them through icy landscapes, deserts, forests, swamps and along the coastlines. After some time, these <u><em>native American</em></u> explorers spread out over the entire continent, until the territories of Patagonia, in the extreme south. Adventure and conquest of new land was one characteristic that <em><u>Europeans</u></em> and <u><em>native Americans</em></u> had in common at that time.

8 0
3 years ago
What if Lincoln would allowed South Carolina to take fort summer in 1861
finlep [7]

Answer:

04/12/2011

On this date, a century and a half ago, Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter, on an island off the coast of South Carolina. The Confederate States of America asserted not only their right to secede but also to claim federal property within their borders. The newly inaugurated U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln, rejected both claims and refused to evacuate Sumter.

“Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy,” Lincoln had said in his somber inaugural address a month earlier. “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.”

The Civil War, to Lincoln, was never technically a “war” but an illegal and unconstitutional rebellion and a fight to put down the rebellion. The details of the events leading to the firing on Fort Sumter have much to do with this attitude and with his total rejection of the possibility of secession.

By attempting to resupply Sumter, Lincoln succeeded in forcing the Confederacy to fire the first shots. Lincoln had to accept the loss of Sumter soon after. But he was successful, so to speak, in forcing the other side to start the shooting. Lincoln believed that justified the military actions that he subsequently ordered to put down the rebellion.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were greeks outdoor theaters shaped like bowles
    12·1 answer
  • Government rules over all aspects of a country people have a few rights what is that called
    8·1 answer
  • What was the cause of Shays’ Rebellion?
    12·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    14·1 answer
  • In 1941 the vietminh united both communist and non-communists in the struggle to expel the __________.
    8·1 answer
  • What new colonies were created in the “great land grab” initiated by King Charles II
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the worlds first civilizations develop in river valley
    9·2 answers
  • English ships much smaller, but they were able to move in and out of the huge Spanish Man-of-War ships and win a pivotal battle
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·1 answer
  • How was Rana Sanga a worthy opponent for Babur? ​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!