This scenario reflects the <u>"sexual orientation"</u> privilege that Michelle does not enjoy.
Sexual orientation is one of the less unmistakable parts of a man and therefore we may not realize that somebody we are collaborating with is gay, lesbian, or promiscuous. Due to the marks of shame joined to having a sexual introduction that is other than hetero, many decide not to share their sexual personality in our way of life. Alongside fear for individual security and separation in lodging and work, the way that in a few states same sex sexual movement is illicit keeps people sequestered from everything.
Answer:
AUTEUR
Explanation:
AUTEUR, the French translation for author is also used to denote an artist. The term describes directors and filmmakers who are responsible for controlling many aspects of a creative work. An Auteur possesses a single vision and consistent individual style that makes his work unique.
Answer:
prevent them from interfering with state courts
Explanation:
- The constitution limits the jurisidiction of the federal court so as to prevent its interferance to state courts.
- Section two of article three of the constitution, defines the jurisidiction of the federal court in terms of its scope and the cases it can handle. This prevents a possible collision between the state and federal laws.
- The constitution,has been amended over time by the congress to limit the jurisdiction of the federal court.
Well, for one, Haiti really didn't have anything to offer the United States. No territory. Nothing to trade. Nothing really. But also, the idea of Africans rising up against an oppressive white government and overthrowing them made the United States very nervous, especially since we, at the time, had institutionalized slavery and a culture that was very much steeped in racism. Basically, we were afraid that if we supported the revolution in Haiti, it would encourage our own slaves to revolt against Southern slaveholders.
Answer:no
Explanation:
The reconstruction process didn't work but in my own opinion it was brought about the end of slavery but it didn't end the segregation and inequality....after the era of the reconstruction there were no longer slaves because of rules put in place but it didn't end segregation and inequality
