The answer is
A. when aggregate income is high, people hold cash to buy goods that are plentiful and cheap.
Answer:The scientific explanation for this is that Jay and Gerard have different ABSOLUTE thresholds.
Explanation:
An absolute threshold refers to the minimun level of stimulus that a person is able to detect at least half the time.
This refers to how one will use their senses to detect that stimulus such as touch , taste, sight , smell and sound.
When you are given different levels of sound volume the smallest volume that you are able to hear is your absolute threshold. This happens 50 percent of the time meaning half the time because not all the time you are able to detect such level of sound or when you are able to feel the slightest touch.
Gerald and Jay then have different ABSOLUTE thresholds Jay seems to have a very strong or sharp or high absolute threshold of touch because he is able to detect the slightest touch whilst Gerald can't detect the slightest touch.
Answer:
Citizenship.
Explanation:
A citizen can be defined as a term used to describe or qualify a person who is legally recognized by the law (constitution) to be a member of a particular country either by birth or naturalization.
Based on the Corporate Code of Ethics, the six(6) universal ethical standards are;
I. Respect.
II. Fairness.
III. Responsibility.
IV. Caring.
V. Trustworthiness.
VI. Citizenship.
In this scenario, Rupert is an individual who believes in contributing to the community by using eco-friendly products. In the context of universal ethical standards, Rupert most likely possesses the core value of citizenship because he is acting in a manner that conserves the atmospheric and biological nature of his country. As a patriotic citizen, he is not polluting the environment.
He is using the "Labeling" aspect of the categorization part of the perception process.
Labelling is portraying somebody or something in a word or short phrase.[1] For instance, depicting somebody who has infringed upon a law as a criminal. Labelling hypothesis is a hypothesis in human science which credits marking of individuals to control and distinguishing proof of degenerate conduct. It has been contended that labelling is fundamental for communication. However, the utilization of the term is frequently proposed to feature the way that the name is a depiction connected all things considered, as opposed to something characteristic for the named thing.