Answer:
c. $5.1 per hour.
Explanation:
Estimated Manufacturing overhead = $249,000
Estimated direct labour hours = 50,000
Predetermined overhead Rate = Estimated Manufacturing overhead / Estimate direct labor hours
Predetermined overhead Rate = $249,000 / 50,000
Predetermined overhead Rate = $4.98
The given is inconsistent with the options given in this question. A similar question is attached with this answer. The following answer is made according to the attached question. please find that.
Estimated Manufacturing overhead = $254,000
Estimated direct labour hours = 50,000
Predetermined overhead Rate = Estimated Manufacturing overhead / Estimate direct labor hours
Predetermined overhead Rate = $254,000 / 50,000
Predetermined overhead Rate = $5.08 = $5.1 per hour
There should be two outside independent observers or
two outside judges on the other words, that must agree and believe that the
definition captures the important characteristics of the target behavior in
order for a behavioral definition to possess social validity.
Answer:
Executive privilege.
Explanation:
If the Congress is investigating U.S. involvement in the civil war in Argentina and they demand the President turns over to them information given to him or her by the State Department and the CIA. The president refuses, asserting the right of executive privilege.
The executive privilege is the assertion of the right to withhold certain information from the court or congress by the president.
It basically, provides immunity for the president from matters relating to foreign affairs, the military and national security.
I'm a little confused on this question however, I'm 99% sure the answer is illusory promise because an illusory promise is one that does not hold any legal weight due to it possibility being a biased and non mutual agreement and it's just a verbal contract in the place of a paper contract.
Answer:
C. VL = VU + PV(Tax Shield) - PV(CFD)
Explanation:
The static trade off theory is a theory of capital structure in corporate finance, first proposed by Alan Kraus and Robert H. Litzenberger. The theory emphasizes the trade-offs between the tax benefits of increasing leverage and the cost of bankruptcy associated with higher leverage. The <u>answer is C</u> as we know relative to the unleveraged firm, leverage provides both costs and benefits. The benefits are the tax shields provided by debt.
