Which of the following cases made "busing" an acceptable approach to integration? (5 points)

History

2 answers:

Mademuasel [1]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is A. <span>Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg</span>

sveta [45]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Busing was made an acceptable approach to integration in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg.

Explanation:

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education was a case decided in 1971 by the Supreme Court that examined the constitutionality of government actions to reduce the effects of racial segregation in public schools in general and, more specifically, to arrange transportation means for African Americans with the goal of promoting integration into public schools (busing).

The court ruled that it was a correct and effective solution to the racial imbalance in schools, even when it was caused by the predominance of a particular ethnic group in the population living close to school rather than segregationist measures.

You might be interested in

What is one way that King Tutankhamen reversed Akhenatons religious reforms?

Tasya [4]

Answer:

He reopened the old temples

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

How were the United States and the Soviet Union different?

Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

Economic: U.S we're democracy so their economy were centrate in private bussinesses and Soviet Union we're focused upon equity of wealth and it's balance distribución among people.

Ideology: US: Democracy ideologies while Soviet Union had dictatorship ideologies

Political: U.S Capitalism while Soviet Union were Communism.

6 0

2 years ago

Following terms in a sentence about the election of 1824 a) plurality b) majority

nekit [7.7K]

A) plurality

explanation: no candidate record a majority. Jackson won a plurality or electoral and popular votes, but the house elected Adams as president.

5 0

3 years ago

you've made the hypothesis that the less rainfall a cactus plant gets, the taller it will grow, since cactuses like dry conditio

kkurt [141]

The amount of rain falling on the cactus plants.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

Here, the independent variable is the amount of rain that makes the cactus plant grow taller. Control is treated the same as all the rest of the samples, except that it is not exposed to variables that are influenced.

In most experiments, it is important to perform a trial with the independent variable, at a special locale for comparison with the other trials.

The control group consists of all trials where the independent variable is left in its natural state. These trials provide a basis for comparison and ensure that any changes observed in the height of cactus plant are in fact caused by the amount of rain.

6 0

3 years ago

Which other case was directly influence by the supreme court's ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland?

Bad White [126]

The answer to your question is Marbury v. Madison

6 0

3 years ago