Answer:
D). The client has no adaptive coping mechanisms.
Explanation:
As per the question, option D i.e. 'The client has no adaptive coping mechanisms' is the statement which reflects the reason why it would be difficult for the client.
Clients learn to lessen the stress or anxiety they experience in either functional or ways that are dysfunctional. Firstly, the nurse discovers the techniques or methods which the client has employed in past and assist the client to recognize maladaptive coping strategies like social withdrawal and improve the techniques by substituting them with adaptive techniques which would suit the client's spiritual as well as personal and cultural values that are most helpful to him. The nurse must not ask the client to give up the coping mechanisms(even maladaptive ones) without proposing other adaptive procedures(mechanisms). Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:B. The NPS manages ecosystem health while the USFS manages resource use.
Explanation:
Hope this helps good luck <33
High labor cost and Reliance on a single crop for export and Low population growth and lack of education are the two obstacles to progress in developing nations.
<h3>How
nation can be a developed country?</h3>
Nation can become a developed country if the economy rate and the employment rate will increase in the nation. The education level plays an essential role as people are not much educated, directly impacted the employment rate.
There are options missing in the question of which are given below-
High population growth and diversification of export
Low population growth and lack of education
High population growth and Reliance on former colonial rulers
High labor cost and Reliance on a single crop for export
Thus, option B and D are correct.
For more details about nation can be a developed country, click here:
brainly.com/question/10303894
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
<span>What are some of the special features in the Pacific coast region
</span>
Islands?
