Answer:
In this situation where a younger supervisor is managing an older, more experienced subordinate I would recommend that the younger supervisor acknowledges the subordinates experience, and is upfront with them about any problems that may arise as this would create a smoother relationship between the two and would allow them to better work together. Specific to the case study, instead of simply firing him/her or giving him a warning I would advise him/her to speak with him/her about what he/she is not doing well, and see if he/she believes if that is something that he can change. If he/she admits that his/her current position is something that he/she can no longer be successful in then it is possible that the company could find another position for him/her, considering that he/she has been an intergral part of the company for many years, and there are people that are loyal to him/her.
Explanation:
They're given money to help support them while they are having difficulty finding jobs since they had a large disadvantage (and still to this day a smaller, but still significant, disadvantage).
Many people argue that the new deal actually hurt many minorities from getting jobs at all since it did not solve any real underlying issue, only supplemented them with money instead of solving the root of the problem in why they could not get a job in the first place.
it was about the twin towers getting collapsed it was basically about 9 11
The correct answer is B) Averting behavior.
Environmental economists seek to implement a study to examine public preferences for alternative forest landscapes. Respondents are asked to choose one of several plans that depict environmental changes from the baseline condition of forests. The nonmarket valuation method that describes this study is Averting behavior.
When trying to find answers in this type of research to know the preferences of the public regarding alternatives to help the forest, the Avertin behavior method helps researches to find useful answers. When applying this research model, researches presume that people interviewed are prone to participate and do something that prevents the consequences mentioned in the question. It takes into consideration that people will do what it takes in order to limit or avoid the negative consequences presented.
The self-control theory of crime, often referred to as the general theory of crime, is a criminological theory about the lack of individual self-control as the main factor behind criminal behavior. The self-control theory of crime suggests that individuals who were ineffectually parented before the age of ten develop less self-control than individuals of approximately the same age who were raised with better parenting.[1] Research has also found that low levels of self-control are correlated with criminal and impulsive conduct.
