Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Those are the side lengths not the angles so I'm not sure, also are you sure that's right? I believe there has to be a hypotenuse and the hypotenuse is the sum of the two shorter sides added together.
Do you have any more information? I can try to help :)
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
Answer:
true
Step-by-step explanation: