Command Economies are typically bad when it comes to a person wanting to make a profit. They focus around (typically) economic equality and lack economic efficiency. Generally speaking, in a command economy, resources are allocated by a Central Planning Committee. This generally will lead to several shortages and/or surpluses in products since the demand/supply can be spontaneous.
Command=Bad
Market Economies are focused around making a profit and Economic Efficiency. Basically, people will be rewarded based on how well resources are allocated among the public. For example, take a parking lot like downtown. Generally in a Market economy, we focus on placing as many cars in the lot as possible and using the space to its full potential. However, in a Command, many in these economies will try to allocate the space so that (strictly for example) 3 small, 3 large, and 3 medium vehicles are parked- thus economic equality.
Finally, with a market economy, there tends to be less shortages and less surpluses, since we operate through the Laws of Supply and Demand in which an equilibrium price will be automatically established through buying and selling
Market=Good
Hope it Helps!
Letter B is the correct answer.
The constitution of 1803 required the Supreme Court to visit every single county in Ohio every year. Since Ohio had 88 counties, the 1851 Constitution decided to find a more plausible solution. Therefore, <u>District courts were added to the court system in order to reduce caseload burdens.</u>
I don't think such event ever happened.
The count force mina to drink his blood because of the sexual attraction that the Count felt toward mina.
He managed to do this because the count threaten that he would kill mina's husband if she do not obeying him.
That was the belief called Manifest Destiny, in which Americans believed that God gave them the right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific