1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
5

How was the knight’s son, the squire, different from his father?

History
1 answer:
frosja888 [35]3 years ago
6 0
Om Prezi;;;The Knight and The Squire Differences and Similarities Similarities 1) They are family, the knight is the squire's father.

2) The Squire and Knight are both chivalrous and respectful, though the Squire is to a much lesser degree.

3)They are both courteous and humble, too.

4)Both the Knight and the squire are members of the Aristocrat class. Squire 1) A very vivacious, or lively, personality
can be compared to the modern day person, or a prince charming of sorts

2)Twenty year old lustful bachelor

<span>3)Stylish and Daring clothing </span>
(very short gown)

4)Perfectly curled hair

5)Selfish Outlook

6) Supposed to be a knight-in-training.

<span>7)Exaggeration of Falseness </span>
within the Squire Knight 1) Perfect Gentleman

2) Still dressed in undershirt and rust stained mail

3) Believes in the ideals of Chivalry

4) Honest, Truthful, and Faithful

5) Always well mannered

6) Professional Soldier

7) Chaucer gave an exaggeration of perfectness to the Knight dssdasdasfsa Differences 1) The Knight is a warrior, but the squire is more an artist (singing, poetry)

2) The Knight takes his duty very seriously, the squire is just along for the fun.

3)The squire is more concerned with his appearance and social status than the training his father is giving him.

4) Knight has much more experience (proven himself in battle, etc.) but the squire acts like he does not want the experiences. To the best of Chaucer's description, the knight is perfect at not only his job, but as a person also. Chaucer has nonstop praise for the Knight. He believes that the Knight is a profound person.

Chaucer views the Knight with great respect. He admires the Knight, and sees no negative in his personality. Chaucer sees the squire as an amusing and talented person, however also as a very bad squire. The squire is a failure because he is training to be a knight, but never wants to become one.

<span>Chaucer is amused by the squire, and cannot see him becoming a knight, but rather a lover and an artist. Chaucer might not see the squire as a bad person, but without a doubt he is a terrible squire.</span>
You might be interested in
A.
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

A-text that is supplemented with decorated initials with miniature illustrations

Explanation:

Took the quiz got it right :/

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A large part of the factory labor force was made up of women and children. TrueFalse *Not now, in history*
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

the factory owners could pay little to no wadges for women and children without expecting a revolt or a union forming. plus children were smaller than a man and women, so they can reach into small places that were extremely dangerous

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5) What percentage of people were unemployed in Toledo, Ohio by 1933? Wh
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

80& of people were unemployment by 1933

to rebuild confidence in the nation's banking system

5 0
3 years ago
Three of the following are basic ideas of Marxism. Which is not
Pepsi [2]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the "market should dominate the economy," since in fact Marx believed that this led to great amounts of social and economic inequality. </span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Imagine you are a writer for an Abolitionist newspaper.
vazorg [7]

As a writer for an abolitionist newspaper, you would write a heated opinion article to criticize the newly enacted Fugitive Slave law.

<h3>What did Abolitionists think of the Fugitive Slave Law?</h3>

I can't write the opinion article for you but I can give you pointers.

Abolitionists in the North were appalled and very angry when they heard that the Fugitive Slave Law had been passed because they believed that it would make it much harder to get people out of slavery.

They also believed that it infringed upon the rights of a State to be a free state that does not permit slavery and lastly, it meant that African Americans who were free in the North could now be targeted by slave hunters which was grossly unfair.

Write these reasons for being against the Fugitive Slave Law in the opinion article and then conclude by calling on the Northern states to resist this law.

Find out more on the Fugitive Slave law at brainly.com/question/542501

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Many philosophers wrote down their philosophies about the government and . A number of philosophers published books on the subje
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the framers of the U.S. constitution choose federalism?
    11·1 answer
  • Please help! Our teacher doesn't teach us correct information, or relevant information to the topic we are currently learning ab
    12·1 answer
  • Difficulties in building and maintaining systems that provided water across village boundarie
    7·1 answer
  • What were the effects on democracy when king john tried to raise taxes on the nobles. ?
    6·1 answer
  • Select all that apply
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the British feel they would have more success fighting in the South?
    14·1 answer
  • Tetras cost $3.99 each. you can spend at most $25. how many tetras can you buy for your aquarium.
    15·2 answers
  • Arguments for joining WWI<br> Arguments against joining WWI<br> *Bullet points please :)
    15·1 answer
  • The main difference between enumerated powers and implied powers in the Constitution is that
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!