Hi I could be ur friend :D
The case chosen for discussion is the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case, which accorded Congress the authority to regulate commerce and navigation, thereby confirming that federal law takes precedence over state laws.
<h3>What was the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case?</h3>
The Gibbons v. Ogden case involved a dispute over shipping monopolies in New York.
When the case reached the Supreme Court, it was decided that Congress had the authority to regulate commerce and navigation according to the Constitution's Commerce Clause.
The implication is that Congress exercises authority over interstate and some intrastate commerce.
Thus, Gibbons v. Ogden expanded the federal powers over the states as a landmark decision.
Learn more about Gibbons v. Ogden at brainly.com/question/10443322
#SPJ1
Well i would say it is labor, because they’re forcing a child to do something that they don’t want to do. like if they ask their child to help out. then that’s fine. but they’re forcing them to help, which isn’t right
just my opinion
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Ratio Decidendi; Obiter Dicta
Explanation:
<em>Ratio Decidendi</em> and <em>Obiter Dicta</em> are Judicial Precedents in law. Judicial Precedents are used by Judges in the Court of law to decide on a current case. Judges apply previously decided cases to a current case.
<em>Ratio Decidendi </em>means the reason for the decision. This pronouncement is binding which must be strictly followed. As the Judge delivers judgment he lay out the facts of the case and outlines the evidence brought before the court. The judge equally examines the argument of Counsel on both sides and apply previously decided cases to arrive at a conclusion.
<em>Obiter Dicta </em>means a statement by the way. In the course of delivering Judgment, the judge might make few remarks that are necessarily not related to law or the facts in an issue that should not be relied on. <em>Obiter Dicta</em> has a persuasive effect.
