Answer:
The correct response is Option b (1.60%).
Explanation:
According to the question,
Initial investment,
= $50,000
Perpetual annual cash flows,
= $800
Now,
The interest rate will be:
= 
On substituting the given values, we get
= 
= 
i.e.,
= 
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Perhaps the most important reason that u.s. companies have moved industrial production abroad is that the labor of the other nation is paid the low wages than the labor wages in US.
Job outsourcing occurs when U.S. companies hire the foreign workers instead of Americans.
Job outsourcing can help American companies to compete in the economy by keeping prices low, but simultaneously it has a negative effect on
America has lost local jobs to different countries labor such as China, Mexico, India, and other countries with lower wage standards.
Companies outsource domestically as well , they do not rely on the other countries completely U.S. employment but they have been increasing their reliance on freelancers or temp workers, as well as the part-timers.
To know more about job outsourcing here:
brainly.com/question/4129759
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes Yes I do what grade though? and type
Explanation:
Answer:
This means that there is an increase in cash(cash has been collected). And for the unearned revenue which is a liability, there is an increase in the liability
Explanation:
This means that there is an increase in cash(cash has been collected). And for the unearned revenue which is a liability, there is an increase in the liability.
Note: Debit side increases asset(cash) and expenses while credit side decreases liability,income and equity.
Credit side decreases asset(cash) and expenses while debit side increases liability,income and equity.
