1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
2 years ago
11

What are raw materials?

History
2 answers:
Dmitry [639]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:the basic material from which a product is made.

Explanation:

miss Akunina [59]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Materials that come straight from the source. They aren't created or altered in any way. They are used as is.

You might be interested in
Select ALL the correct locations on the image.
Mkey [24]

Answer:

wherres da image                            

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did Mau Mau try to gain independence for Kenya?
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In 1836, Sam Houston, acting as a commissioner of the provisional Texas government, negotiated a treaty with ___________ that se
KiRa [710]

Answer:

Chief Santanta

Explanation:

so the answer D

5 0
3 years ago
What has been true in the United States since the 1960s?
Semenov [28]
Minorities have become quicker than the white population.
This has been true in the United States since the 1960s.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3 Points
REY [17]

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do you think the Persian policy of tolerance helped the empire grow so large ?
    11·1 answer
  • The majority ethnic group in Rwanda is the?
    8·2 answers
  • True or false : george washington was born in england?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the meanings of the following two terms<br> Yields<br> Buying power
    12·1 answer
  • What impact does American domestic policy have upon foreign policy?
    12·1 answer
  • 6. In the 5th century B.C.E., began to appear in Greek sculpture. (2 points)
    8·1 answer
  • How were the Quakers different from other religious groups in America in the 1600s?
    8·1 answer
  • Plz help me I am timed plz help
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not a US response to the XYZ Affair?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the American colonies fight against Britain? Please explain your answer.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!