What is the relationship between historical questions and historical arguments

2 answers:

8 0

A historical argument is An argument is a set of propositions designed to demonstrate that a particular conclusion, called the thesis, is true. An argument is not simply a statement of opinion, but an attempt to give reasons for holding certain opinions.

And a historical question is like this. Those who seek to understand the past must formulate questions about the past, and answer those questions based on historical evidence. Now, let's review our key terms. The scientific method guides historians in understanding the past. The scientific method is is a process of investigation used to arrive at a truth.

So if you read threw these 2, you should be able to find the relationship. I really hope this helps and good luck on the quiz or test you are taking. :D

san4es73 [151]3 years ago

5 0

Historical questions are the basis for most historical arguments or perspectives. The desire to know and understanding the past generates a certain degree of inquiry. Historians then develop different perspectives regarding historical questions. These arguments can lead to the development of different school of historical thought.

You might be interested in

GDP and ____ are the two main components of the business cycle.

Mandarinka [93]

I believe it is unemployment. I think GDP and unemployment are the two main factors in the business cycle.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. Which of the following statements is not true regarding historians?

Bingel [31]

Answer:

It is not true that historians have the freedom to omit parts of evidence that they do not agree with.

Explanation:

Historians are academic professionals whose job is to collect events that occurred in the past, interpret them, and explain their development and consequences, including making connections between those events in the past and events in the present.

For this reason, historians cannot suppress content or events with which they do not agree, because if they did, they would be modifying the course of events and, therefore, reproducing an account of the events that would not coincide with reality.

7 0

3 years ago

Why were colonists being taxed with different acts

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

so britain could get money

6 0

3 years ago

1. Explain what the Truman Doctrine entailed.

Natali [406]

Answer:

states the u.s. will aid any free government resisting an armed minority.. we will help anyone that is anti communist.(free). if soviet invades a nation we could help that nation and fight soviets without actually fighting them ourselves. implanted when soviets moved into Greece and turkey (300 million dollars in aid provided to them).. this makes soviets mad and we tell them ab Truman doctrine.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Why did the Spanish build Castillo de San Marcos?

mote1985 [20]

The correct answer is B. To defend against imperial challengers

Explanation:

The Castillo de San Marcos was a fort built by the Spanish in St. Agustine, Florida in 1672 as back then Florida territory was part of the Spanish Empire and not part of the U.S. The main purpose of this fort was to protect the city and the people in them from attacks led by other empires or by countries that wanted to take control of the territory. Indeed, the fort was built after an English raid in 1668 followed by two other attacks by the English after the fort was built. Additionally, after Florida became part of the U.S. the fort was used as a prison. Considering this, it can be concluded the purpose of the Castillo de San Marcos was to defend the city against imperial challengers.

8 0

3 years ago