The name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom is:
According to the given question, we are asked to state the name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that there is a will to be free and independent and when a person tries to threaten those freedom, then there is a chance that the people would do what they are not allowed to do in order to reclaim that freedom and this is called reactance.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/19037183
Question:
Suppose the government has imposed a price ceiling on cellular phones. Which of the following events could transform the price ceiling from one that is binding to one that is not binding? a. Cellular phones become more popular. b. Traditional land line phones become more expensive. C. The components used to produce cellular phones become more expensive. @ A technological advance makes cellular phone production less expensive.
Answer:
.A technological advance makes cellular phone production less expensive.
Explanation:
Government could in consideration of the product's lower production cost, opt to adjust the price ceiling.
What's the rationale behind this?
The decrease in production cost for cellular phones means the industry can afford to produce and sell at lower price(maybe even lower) than the price ceiling. This would mean that businesses in this industry may be charging incredibly high prices compared to cost of production and still not hit price ceiling. Therefore government may need to lower price ceiling to suit current cost of production.
Is there more to this question?
Spencer trusted that exclusive the fittest society would get by after some time, prompting general up reviewing of the world overall. Herbert Spencer was a noteworthy figure in the scholarly existence of the Victorian time. He was one of the vital advocates of developmental hypothesis in the mid nineteenth century, and his notoriety at the time matched that of Charles Darwin.