Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
Answer:
the Dalai Lama spiritual leader
Answer:
1 )The land west of the Mississippi was unsuitable for farming and white settlers wanted to move to the Southeast where Native Americans lived. They wanted the government to move the Native Americans to the Plains so the whites could settle in the Southeast for farming.
2 ) Little thought had been given to these, and in the crowded and unsanitary conditions, measles, whooping cough and dysentery took a terrible toll throughout the summer. After most of the Cherokee had been collected, relocation by boat began in August, but drought had made Tennessee River unusable.
Hope this helps!
Sincerely; Victoria<3
Explanation:
Answer:
General Deterrence
Explanation:
Deterrence is of two types including:
1. General deterrence.
2. Specific deterrence.
General deterrence: The term general deterrence is defined as the process that is being designed to stop or prevent various crimes in a general population. In this scenario, this creates is a huge impact on people related to the legal punishment threat because the person involved in any illegal thing shall be punished in public in a way to humiliate the person. Hence, the other person who sees this will be scared of doing similar crimes.
In the question above, the statement signifies the "general deterrence".
I’m just gna take the free points here
