Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
It pumps the blood in and out of the heart. If I remember right I think that’s it.
What are the answer choices?
Answer:
Families and society are both negatively impacted by increased financial stress due to tobacco use. Neither families nor society are negatively impacted by loss of productivity due to tobacco use.
Explanation:
Carbohydrates changed into sugar
proteins broken down to amino acids
fats converted to fatty acids
nutrients carried to cells
