1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
2 years ago
8

Why did the Federalists approve of the separation of powers in the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
natita [175]2 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is They thought it was necessary to protect the liberty of Americans.

The Federalists were a group of individuals who wanted a strong central government when developing the new US Constitution. The Federalists felt that the old constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was too weak and lacked the strength needed to keep the country together. This is why the Federalists advocated for a stronger federal (central) government.

The Federalists also wanted to ensure that the federal government did not become corrupt or tyrannical. This is why they approved of a system of checks and balances, in which each branch of the federal government has specific powers. For example, the legislative branch creates laws, the president enforces laws, and the judicial branch interprets the law.

joja [24]2 years ago
5 0
They thought it was necessary to protect the liberty of Americans
You might be interested in
A royal colony is owned by the king/queen while a proprietary colony is owned by
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

C. Wealthy investors and businessmen.

Explanation:

TOOK THE TEST!

7 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIEST! Which did not occur in the Haymarket Square incident?
mina [271]
B hope this helps!:)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. What economic problem did the nation face?
Kitty [74]

Answer:

Explanation:

what are the answer options. The nation use to suffer from high property taxes. they lowered taxes to stop protest and fighting.

6 0
3 years ago
Like the Egyptians, the kush ites
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

need same one did you get it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the sources a historian uses to support an argument?
mafiozo [28]
Historians often rely on both primary and secondary sources when supporting an argument, since it's important to use secondary sources to put the argument in context, and primary sources in order to make an original point.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was in charge of reconstruction after the civil war
    5·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of French Revolution
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the founder of the umayyad dynasty and where did he move the capital of the Arab empire
    8·1 answer
  • -/John of Damascus major achievements?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did students at Kent University in Ohio protest the bombing of Cambodia
    12·2 answers
  • The factor that may well have tipped the electoral scales for John F. Kennedy in the presidential election of 1960 was(A) his ag
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! ASAP!!!! GIVING 40 POINTS +BRAINLIEST (if correct) + THANKYOU!!!!! (On both profile and answer)
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains the economic relationship described in the sources?
    15·1 answer
  • What gave Americans the freedom of the press and speech?
    10·2 answers
  • Henry Ford would have been most interested to bring which modern innovation to his automotive factories? A. time-study analysis
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!