Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
And we got finally:
And the amount for Zaid would be 1.2*360 ft= 432ft
So then Zaid construc 432 ft and Matias 360 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we know that Zaid and Matias, two farmers, constructed a 792 foot fence around their very large garden so then the total is represented by 792 ft
We also know that Zaid agreed to construct 20% more of the fence than Matias did. Let's assume that the amount that construct by Matias was x then the amount constructed by Zaid would be 1.2 x representing 20% more than Matias and we can set up the following equation:
And we got finally:
And the amount for Zaid would be 1.2*360 ft= 432ft
So then Zaid construc 432 ft and Matias 360 ft
7a-4=3a+27+4a
7a-4=7a+27
you sure you type the right question?
Answer:
Inverse of g(x)=x+15/3
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x)=3x-15
Let, g(x) be y
y=3x-15
Interchange x and y
x=3y-15
x+15=3y
y=x+15/3
5x10-27=$23
5 = amount of bills, 10= dollar bills, 27= cost of toy, 23= cost leftover
