Our well-being can be influenced by constructive and destructive relations. Constructive relationships can continue to strengthen our character and how we communicate with others. In the other hand, our self-esteem or our relations with other people can be destroyed by destructive relations. Depending on the kinds of relations we have, such relationships will affect your well-being positively or negatively.
Explanation:
Constructive relations are relations in which roles are flexible, there is "mutual respect" for relations & "open communication". These are a few elements of a strong communication. This results in a happier and healthy well-being. There is a positive effect on the persons involved in the relationship and such relationship make the lives of people healthier and peaceful. Also, a constructive relation portrays strong "mutual understanding" between two people.
On the other hand, destructive or toxic relation are distinguished by selfish intentions and lack of respect for others wellbeing. These relations must be stopped. This contributes to a very "poor health" which may lead to problems with "mental health". In such relationships there is no "mutual understanding", which creates a big difference in the relationship between people leading to tension, anxiety and depression. It is usually impossible to get out while you are in a destructive relationship but it may be achieved with proper support.
Answer:
No this is false
Explanation:
The correct answer would be:
Nomads are a type of people who don't settle in one place but rather move from one area to another consistently during their entire life.
As we do not have access to this text, we cannot provide examples, citations or references of this text. However, we are able to look at what servant leadership is and how it is exercised in the world.
Servant leadership is a philosophy of leadership in which a person is considered a leader because he serves. This kind of leader puts the needs of his employees first. Moreover, his main focus is that of helping the employees thrive and develop as much as possible. According to this philosophy, instead of the people working to serve the leader, the leader exists to serve the people.
