Answer:
$3.75
Explanation:
As we already know that
Direct materials quantity variance = (Budged pounds of direct material - Actual pounds of direct material) × Standard rate
$1,500 unfavorable = (4,400 pounds - 4,800 pounds) × Standard rate
$1,500 unfavorable = 400 × Standard rate
So, standard rate is
= $1,500 ÷ $400
= $3.75
We simply applied the above formula
Zero unemployment and zero inflation is not good fpr the economy because inflation is important to keep the economy running.economis t call this sustainable inflation. when there is an inflation , you know that the price will rise in the future. your money is more valuable now since the price is lower then the future thus you sped noe instead of saving. this keeps the economy running.
If unmeployment were zero that would mean no new business could start, no existing business could expand and no one is entering the labor force. shortage of labor like this would increase the wage as the existing business have to compete for the labors and if wage sgoes up then prices goes up as well: inflation.
Answer: b. Because of unpredictable changes in the public's desire to hold cash or borrow and banks' desires to hold reserves or lend.
Explanation:
The Fed is able to embark on monetary policy that influences the entire country - and the world to some extent - because they have very strong influence over the money supply of the US$.
This influence is not absolute however because as the old adage goes, "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink". In other words, the Fed can relax(impose) restrictions to make money more(less) available but they cannot force people to borrow(hold) that money.
They can't force banks either to either hold reserves or lend money out because banks are free to impose their own reserve limits on top of those of the Fed.
I would say that the stock market deals with selling and buying shares according to the confidence of the shareholders in say the price of metals and the quality of the companies' assets, whereas for currency exchange, it is based on the exchange rates between currencies and converting one to the other.
Answer:
None.
Explanation:
Ned is not allowed to deduct the loss on rental property against her income. In USA real estate losses are allowed for tax payers to be deducted from their income if they own a rental property. A tax payer can deduct $25,000 of real estate loss on gross income of $100,000 or less. If adjusted gross income of an individual exceeds $150,000 then real estate losses deductions are not allowed. Ned has income of $160,000 which is above the threshold of $150,000 therefore no losses can be deducted from the income.
