Answer:
Senate : Represent affect the entire States
House of Representative: Represent Individual districts within the States
Explanation:
The officials that are seated in the House of Representative will more likely influence the matters that are influencing the people on Local levels. (such as fixing local park, investment in local road infrastructure, etc)
The Senate on the other hand, will influence the matters that will influence both the states and the people nationwide. For example Senates will be involved in the election of Supreme Court Judge, Determining Academic standard for the students In each states, etc.
Answer:
A Juvenile is a young person. A delinquent is a criminal.
A juvenile delinquent is a young person that commits crimes or other bad behaviors.
Explanation:
Somehow confusing because the Christian worldview does not accept spiritism or shamanism.
If the question was like, “What is the worldview with the historical worldview of spirits and shamanism,” I’d put shamanism or animism.
Hope it works!
Good luck :)
Answer:
Financial circumstances; home life
Explanation:
Subjective well-being (SWB) is a self-reported measure of well-being.
Nikita comes from a country with a relatively low average income, therefore Nikita's subjective well-being is especially likely to be influenced by satisfaction with her FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES. This is because she earns a low income which is likely to be a challenge in her new location, financial circumstances would influence her lifestyle, so she has to be extremely economical.
Meanwhile, Francoise lives in a country, where the standard of living is fairly high. Francoise's subjective well-being is especially likely to be influenced by satisfaction with her HOME LIFE. Francoise is more financially stable, so she doesn't need to be so economical with her spending, her well being is based on her home life.
Answer:
d. shows that he was following the categorical imperative.
Explanation:
Kant advocated that people should do their duty from a sense of duty or what is morally correct . But sometimes it is difficult to judge what is morally correct . In case of uncertainty , we should be guided by the principle
of " categorical imperative". Its meaning basically is that , we should judge by thinking , what if everybody acts the way , I am thinking to do. If I think , taking bribe is right , what if everybody takes bribe . The outcome will be disastrous . So bribe taking can not be morally correct. This is how
" categorical imperative" works
