Answer:
$534,600
Explanation:
<em>Contribution margin = Sales - Variable Costs</em>
where :
Sales = 2,700 units x $664 = $1,792,800
Variable Costs = Costs of Goods Sold + Variable Selling Costs + Variable Administrative Cots
= 2,700 units x $405 + 2,700 units x $48 + 2,700 units x $13
= $1,258,200
therefore,
Contribution margin = $1,792,800 - $1,258,200 = $534,600
Answer: 4.7%
Explanation:
Expected return is calculated as:
= Risk free return + Beta ( Market risk premium)
10.8% = 5% + (1.22 × Market risk premium)
10.8% - 5% = 1.22market risk premium
5.8%/1.22 = market risk premium
Market risk premium = 0.058/1.22
Market risk premium = 0.047
Market risk premium = 4.7%
Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
Answer:
Bad Debt Expense ($40,000 - $3,200) $36,800
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $36,800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
Explanation:
The adjusting entry is shown below:
Bad Debt Expense ($40,000 - $3,200) $36,800
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $36,800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and credited the allowance for doubtful debts as it decreased the value of the assets
And since there is a credit balance so the same is deducted from the account receivable
If my client Beth has a home in California with a first and second mortgage and is looking for a vacation home and asks if she can deduct mortgage interest, I would suggest obtaining a mortgage secured by the second home and deducting the interest from the loan.
Mortgage interest settled on a second home used personally is deductible as long as the mortgage fulfills the exact prerequisites for deductible interest as on your primary home, and if the second home is put on for rent, the loan taken for the second home will not have a limit for the deduction of interest payment.
Vacation Home with Second house mortgage
brainly.com/question/28240585
#SPJ4
