Answer:
case 1) 
case 2) 
Step-by-step explanation:
case 1) we know that
Using proportion
solve for z
case 2) we know that
Using proportion
solve for z
Answer:
P(A&B) = 0.4
Explanation:
Because it is a random process and there are no special constraints the probability for everybody is the same, the probability of choosing a particular site is 1/7, the person originally seated in chair number seven has 5/7 chance of not seating in chair number six and seven, the same goes for the person originally seated in chair number six; Because we want the probability of the two events happening, we want the probability of the intersection of the two events, and because the selection of a chair change the probability for the others (Dependents events) the probability P(A&B) = P(A) * P(B/A) where P(A) is 5/7 and the probability of choosing the right chair after the event A is 4/7, therefore, P(A&B) = 4/7*5/7 = 0.4.
If the events were independent the probability would be 0.51.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(290 ft - 125 ft)/(3 hours) = (165 ft)/(3 hours) = 55 ft/hour
Koolkid239
Angelica calculated the distance between the two points shown on the graph below.
Step 1: Use the point C(–4, –5) to make a right triangle with the 90 degree vertex at C.
Step 2: Determine the lengths of the legs: AC = 6 and BC = 10.
Step 3: Substitute the values into the Pythagorean theorem: mc010-2.jpg.
Step 4: Evaluate mc010-3.jpg
She states the length of AB is 8 units. Which best describes the accuracy of Angelica’s solution?
Angelica is correct.
Angelica made an error determining the location of the right angle. The right angle should be at (2, 5).
Angelica made an error counting the lengths of the legs of the right triangle. The lengths should be 7 and 11.
Angelica made an error substituting the values into the Pythagorean theorem. The equation should be mc010-4.jpg
