1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
defon
3 years ago
10

Sarah is an unofficial leader of a group. When she makes an outlandish proposal, everyone takes it seriously. But if Bill, anoth

er member of the group, had proposed the same thing, he would have been ridiculed. This is an example of
a. norm conformity.
b. norm reciprocity.
c. norm generalization.
d. norm assimilation.
e. norm variation.
Social Studies
1 answer:
liq [111]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Option A

Explanation:

A norm in another words mean standard that is generally accepted. While conformity, comes from the word conform. I.e to agree with a standard.

Relating to the above scenario, Sarah has a leader of a group, people agree with what she says unlike bill . In this case, people conform with Sarah as she is a leader ,it is a general norm to follow what a leader says or proposes.

You might be interested in
Saint for whom the russian alphabet is named ____
Lerok [7]

Answer:

Cyril

Explanation:

Saint for whom the russian alphabet is named Cyril.

5 0
3 years ago
Describe the three reasoning processes that serve as central research tools in philosophical studies of physical activity
alexgriva [62]

Answer:

Inductive reasoning: starts with specific cases and develops general principles.

Deductive reasoning: starts with general principles and examines specifics.

Deductive and Speculative: looks at one example and describes its essential qualities.

Critical and poetic:  criticizes traditional philosophical thinking and engages philosophical thinking and engages in tentative speculative reasoning.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which sentence contains a misspelled word?
rjkz [21]
Hi, the answer would be the 1st Sentence, "The way that story ended was just a bit too wierd". 'Wierd" is spelled weird. Let me know if you need more help. Hope this helped :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Internal Coherence Four criteria bear on the question of the tentative acceptability of a hypothesis: adequacy, internal coheren
lianna [129]

Answer:

d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.

Explanation:

The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the second case in which the u. S. Supreme court employed the power of judicial review to overthrow a federal law or par
inysia [295]

After using its judicial review authority in the Marbury case, the Supreme Court for the next 50 years refrained from overturning any federal laws. In Dred Scott v. Sandford,  the court finally did so (1857).

A judge analyses the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.

The Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856; decided 1857) that all Americans of African heritage, whether free or slave, were not citizens of the United States and could not file lawsuits in federal court. The Court further determined that Congress lacked the authority to outlaw slavery in American territories.

Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), unquestionably the most contentious judgement the US Supreme Court has ever made, and also one of the most significant cases in US constitutional history.

It was the first Supreme Court decision to invalidate a federal legislation since Marbury v. Madison, in Cass Sunstein's words.

Since Marbury established judicial review in the context of a jurisdictional refusal, Dred Scott might be considered the first legitimate application of the judicial review power. In addition, it was "one of the first significant cases using the unambiguous term 'purpose of the framers.'

To know more about Supreme Court, visit:

brainly.com/question/15111973

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A defined contribution retirement plan such as a 401k that is "top heavy" is one which:A. permits larger contributions for emplo
    14·1 answer
  • Wydawca oPRACOWUJE sŁOWNIK jĘZYKA pOLSKIEGO uZUPEŁNIJ kOLEJnE hASŁA
    5·1 answer
  • The following statement refers to which reflexive self: "Trait terms convey what I perceive to be my overall acting style, based
    5·1 answer
  • Which was not a justification for slavery that Mississippi offered?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the definition of civil liberty?
    9·2 answers
  • “About ten a clocke we came into a deepe Valley, full of brush, wood-gaile, and long grasse, through which wee found little path
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement refers to convection?
    11·1 answer
  • Question-What do you think the native people found surprising about the conquistadors?
    14·1 answer
  • On the Revolutionary War Museum 2/12/21 Name 3 things you learned on this tour.
    5·1 answer
  • A compass needle is a small _____ that responds to the magnet force exerted on it by a nearby magnetic field
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!