Answer:
yes I give
Explanation:
Regular maintenance and repairing of old and broken or damaged sites. - Public awareness about the importance of cultural heritage and way to preserve them. - Strict security should be maintained. - Control of pollution around the cultural heritage sites.
Answer:
The correct answer is: <em>B. A study of the types and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in small rural towns in a mid-western state.</em>
Explanation:
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is a topic that has had stigma, negative stereotypes and other negative connotations attached to it throughout history. If a study investigated the types and prevalence of STIs in small rural towns in a mid-western state, along with stigmatizing participants in the study, the results of this study could also potentially stigmatize residents of these towns by extrapolating claims such as "town <em>X </em>in this mid-western state has high prevalence of various types of STIs". These claims might make it seem like the presence of STIs is high in a given rural town (when this in fact might be untrue), especially considering the town is small in size. In this way, a study that investigates the types and prevalence of STIs in small rural towns in a mid-western state could produce harm to members of the sampled population who do not actually participate in the research study.
Answer:
A. Use concrete reinforcers even when children are intrinsically motivated to learn.
Explanation:
Concrete reinforcement is carried out by giving either reward or discouragement to motivate the children into doing a behavior that we want them to.
When children are already intrinsically motivation to learn, this type of reinforcement is no longer necessary and doing that possess the risk to actually stray the children's motivation away from learning by themselves.
Answer to this Question is <u>d. Second-Order-Realities</u>
Explanation:
In discussion after the first day of class, Jesse and Kareem both clearly recalled that their new physics professor had said, "Taking this class in a seven week summer course will be a challenge." but they disagreed about what their professor meant by this statement. This is due to differences in second-order-realities.
Yes, both Jesse and Kareem clearly agrees upon the statement of their professor what did he say about their new physics class but they disagreed upon what actually was meant by this statement. This difference, gap or discrepancy is certainly due to the second-order realities because it they clearly understood what their professor said but the difference came in the understanding. Putting it more clear, the difference was due their perception that how did they perceive what was said by their professor, not what actually he said. It happens in second-order realities that we see and observe the things and try to conclude it on the base of our own frame of mind or perception. In second-order realities we actually feel the tings from our perspective not from the point of view of how actually the things are in reality. For example, the 50 degree Celsius temperature could be very normal for one one person but the same temperature can be felt on an extreme level by some other person. In the same way, if some say something to us, we will only perceive it from our frame of reference and perception. That's the same case which has been happened here with Jesse and Kareem, the main difference in their thinking came due to second-order realities.
i think it is the second one
