Answer:
A socio-environmental approach would be used.
Explanation:
The sociological should use a socio-environmental approach to analyze the problem shown in the question above. This is because communication between indigenous communities, members of environmental groups and industry is a social problem that involves communication rather than understanding facts. However, this problem is generated by the environmental impact caused by the pipeline, which must also be analyzed and discussed. Due to this diversity of subjects, within this situation, the sociologist would be able to analyze everything more effectively through a socio-environmental approach.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
<u>The statement is</u><u> False</u>
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Energy production needs a source. These sources may be renewable or non renewable but in both cases they are present naturally in the universe and we cannot make anything without using natural resources. For example if we use nuclear energy we need radioactive minerals. Similarly water, air, solar energy, coal, fossil fuels, natural gas or whatever source we take, they are all present in nature already so natural resources are required for all energy producing technology whatever the industry we take.
The genetic code is broken down into a series of codons on the mRNA. Each codon consists of 3 nucleotides which (normally) correspond to a single amino acid (e.g. AUG codes for methionine). I say normally because you can also have a codon indicate a stop codon (so no amino acid will be inserted and instead the polypeptide chain will terminate). This mRNA molecule with its list of codons will instruct a ribosome to synthesize a protein according to this code.
This code is the set of rules - based on the triplet or codon. This triplet code is universal - all organisms use the same codons to specify the placement of each of the 20 amino acids in a protein.
