1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
3 years ago
6

JJ's is reviewing a project with a required discount rate of 15.2 percent and an initial cost of $309,000. The cash inflows are

$47,000, $198,000, and $226,000 for Years 2 to 4, respectively. Should the project be accepted based on discounted payback if the required payback period is 2.5 years?
Business
1 answer:
MissTica3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Reject; The project never pays back on a discounted basis

Explanation:

Discounted pay back period calculates the amount of the time it takes to recover the amount invested in a project to be recovered from the cumulative discounted cash flow.

$47,000 / 1.152^2 = $35,415.46

$198,000 / 1.152^3 = $129,511.33

$226,000 / 1.152^4 = $128,321.23

The amount invested is $-309,000

The amount recovered in year 2 = $309,000 + $35,415.46 = $-273,584.54

The amount recovered in year 3 = $-273,584.54 + $129,511.33 = $-144,073.21

The amount recovered in year 4 = $-144,073.21 + $128,321.23 = $-15,751.98

The amount invested is never recovered

The project shouldn't be accepted

I hope my answer helps you

You might be interested in
An economy's standard of living can be at its highest if:
Natasha2012 [34]
Whats the answer options you get

8 0
3 years ago
A homeowner paid $85,000 for a house three years ago. The house sells today for $110,000. How much has the property appreciated?
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Option (a) is correct.

Explanation:

Amount paid for house three years ago = $85,000

Selling price of house today = $110,000

Therefore,

Property appreciated by following percentage:

= (change in value ÷ Amount paid for house three years ago) × 100

= [($110,000 - $85,000) ÷ $85,000] × 100

= ($25,000 ÷ $85,000) × 100

= 0.2941 × 100

= 29.41%

6 0
3 years ago
Explain why, in seeking to avoid financial crisis, the government's role as regulator of the financial system does not imply it
GREYUIT [131]

Answer: Market Efficiency

Explanation:

It is important that the Government as a regulator should not get involved in acts that would protect individual institutions from failure because that would defeat the whole purpose of a competitive industry.

If a government is known to directly involve itself in the protection of institutions from failure, efficiency in institutions may become low because of the lack of fear of failure as companies believe that should they run into bad times, they will simply be bailed out by the government so there is no need for them to maintain a competitive edge.

This can lead to a situation where we have companies performing sub optimally in an economy which can only act to reduce the Economic growth of a country.

Government institutions usually have such backing and in a lot of countries are prone to failure. Look at the Bamangwato Concessions Limited (BCL) mine in Botswana for instance that kept failing and refusing to improve it's efficiency because they could always run back to the government for a bailout. Their position eventually became so untenable that bankruptcy was the only option.

3 0
3 years ago
Federal Coordinating Structures include:
WINSTONCH [101]

The correct answer is choice b, Emergency Support Functions.

There are two Federal Coordinating Structures. The National Security Council is the coordinating structure for national policy. Emergency Support Functions is the coordinating structures for building, sustaining, and delivering emergency functions. The only one of these two options available is Emergency Support Functions, which makes it the correct answer.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Money, Inc., has no debt outstanding and a total market value of $240,000. Earnings before interest and taxes, EBIT, are project
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

a. Calculate earnings per share, EPS, under each of the three economic scenarios (recession, normal, expansion) before any debt is issued. = 1.38667

b. Calculate the percentage changes in EPS when the economy expands or enters a recession. = -20.00%

c. Calculate earnings per share (EPS) under each of the three economic scenarios assuming the company goes through with recapitalization. = 1.56444

d. Given the recapitalization, calculate the percentage changes in EPS when the economy expands or enters a recession. = -37.14%

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whats the process of Observing someone actually working in a career that interest you?
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose that a company needs 1,500,000 items during a year and that preparation for each production run costs $900. Suppose also
    13·1 answer
  • Alfredo Inc. reports net income of $247,000 for the year ended December 31. It also reports $95,100 depreciation expense and a $
    15·1 answer
  • Once something is considered scarce, it is scarce forever. <br> A. True<br> B. False
    9·1 answer
  • When a business seeks a certain profit, it uses a factor to adjust its price. The factor is called a _____.?
    9·2 answers
  • Darwin Company, a manufacturer, has provided the following information pertaining to its recent year of operation: • Net income
    7·1 answer
  • Henry works in the HR department of an advertising firm that has recently brought in employees specializing in analysis of large
    6·1 answer
  • A 4PL, commonly referred to as a lead logistics provider, is a trucking company that also provides tracking servicesa) true b) f
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER FOR BRAINLIEST How is the Lucy v. Zehmer case similar to the TV series Suit: 'Napkin Contracts'? How are they diff
    14·1 answer
  • Grand River Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 in year 1 and paid federal income taxes of $105,000. Not included in
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!