<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
Answer:
There are many disadvantages of exclusion in societies. One disadvantage is that social exclusion creates parallel sub-societies and sub-cultures within a society, that threaten the social order of a particular area.
Another disadvantage, related with the first, is that exclusion leads to little dialogue among different social groups. This can greatly increased social conflict, political extremism and radicalization, and in extreme cases, as history has shown many times, could lead to civil war.
True
c::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
Answer: The answer is B. Only about 1% of the freshwater on Earth is easily accessible.
If I had taken part in the redevelopment of the social readjustment rating scale, I would have been asked to estimate the amount of readjustment required for various life changes.
The Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) was developed by Thomas Holmes and Richard Rahe to measure stress by allocating a number of life change units to life events, both positive and negative, that typically necessitate some adjustment.
The Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) has been used in hundreds of studies to provide researchers with a simple, easy-to-administer way of assessing the amount of stress in people's lives. Despite its widespread use, the scale has been criticised.
To know more about Social Readjustment Rating Scale here-
brainly.com/question/15454177
#SPJ4
