<em>In the modern era, the equivalent practice of using the presidency as a bully pulpit (Theodore Roosevelt) could best be summed up in the phrase,</em> "going public". President Theodore Roosevelt took an unrestricted view of his job. In two administrations, he never hesitated to take his case - controversies - <u>directly to the people</u> (a Presidency called “bully pulpit”). He was the typical proactive President of the 19th century.
Bully pulpit is the ability to use the Presidency´s office to influence Congress to accept legislative proposals. An active use of the Presidency’s prestige to inspire/moralize.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
This statement is false.
Unfortunately, there isn't enough funding to supply the enforcement needed to make these laws and treaties legal and applicable. Every year, there are so many new laws and treaties signed in order to protect various species, however, often there isn't enough money to actually enforce them which is why most of them never become laws.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Polythiesm is the belief of more than One god
