Which group protects human subjects as they are involved in research activities?

1 answer:

5 0

I believe the answer is: <span>. Institutional Review Board (IRB)
</span><span>. Institutional Review Board (IRB) was initially created in order to prevent the abuse that happened in many method of research in 20th century..
</span>Because of this institution, researchers nowadays have to follow very strict standards that would limit what they can and couldn't do in their research.

You might be interested in

True or false the majority of democratic countries rely on first past the post electoral systems

aalyn [17]

The answer is True

Democracy is a system in which people in a country can participate in political life. This participation can take place through elections, plebiscites and referendum. Within a democracy, people have freedom of expression and the expression of their opinions. Most nations in the world today follow the democratic system of government.

7 0

3 years ago

According to a recent survey of top digital and technology experts, what percent thought that advertising would focus on targeti

gayaneshka [121]

I think its C. 41 percent

7 0

3 years ago

HELP 50 POINTS! On the subject of humanity in the case of David Sharp, make a statement or comment. What do you think or feel? W

xxTIMURxx [149]

<h2><em><u>Answer: can u pls mark me brainliest and i hope u no this answer is not 50 pnts ok its 25</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Human nature is a bundle of characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting, which humans are said to have naturally.[1][2][3][4] The term is often regarded as capturing what it is to be human, or the essence of humanity. The term is controversial because it is disputed whether or not such an essence exists. Arguments about human nature have been a mainstay of philosophy for centuries and the concept continues to provoke lively philosophical debate.[5][6][7] The concept also continues to play a role in science, with neuroscientists, psychologists and social scientists sometimes claiming that their results have yielded insight into human nature.[8][9][10][11] Human nature is traditionally contrasted with characteristics that vary among humans, such as characteristics associated with specific cultures. Debates about human nature are related to, although not the same as, debates about the comparative importance of genes and environment in development ("nature versus nurture"). </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The concept of nature as a standard by which to make judgments is traditionally said to have begun in Greek philosophy, at least as regards the Western and Middle Eastern languages and perspectives which are heavily influenced by it.[12] </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The teleological approach of Aristotle came to be dominant by late classical and medieval times. By this account, human nature really causes humans to become what they become, and so it exists somehow independently of individuals. This in turn has been understood as also showing a special connection between human nature and divinity. This approach understands human nature in terms of final and formal causes. In other words, nature itself (or a nature-creating divinity) has intentions and goals, similar somehow to human intentions and goals, and one of those goals is humanity living naturally. Such understandings of human nature see this nature as an "idea", or "form" of a human.[13] </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>However, the existence of this invariable and metaphysical human nature is subject of much historical debate, continuing into modern times. Against this idea of a fixed human nature, the relative malleability of man has been argued especially strongly in recent centuries—firstly by early modernists such as Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In Rousseau's Emile, or On Education, Rousseau wrote: "We do not know what our nature permits us to be".[14] Since the early 19th century, thinkers such as Hegel, Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, structuralists, and postmodernists have also sometimes argued against a fixed or innate human nature. </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Charles Darwin's theory of evolution has changed the nature of the discussion, supporting the proposition that mankind's ancestors were not like mankind today. Still more recent scientific perspectives—such as behaviorism, determinism, and the chemical model within modern psychiatry and psychology—claim to be neutral regarding human nature. As in much of modern science, such disciplines seek to explain with little or no recourse to metaphysical causation.[15] They can be offered to explain the origins of human nature and its underlying mechanisms, or to demonstrate capacities for change and diversity which would arguably violate the concept of a fixed human nature.</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2>

6 0

3 years ago

In american political culture, economic freedom is most closely linked to the idea of

kherson [118]

It most closely linked to the idea of <span>laissez-faire capitalism
</span><span>laissez-faire capitalism refers to an economic system in which government will have no roles whatsoever in creating economic regulations.
Under this system, the power within the economy is 100% held by the private sectors and they have the freedom to impose any business tactics that they want.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

What are two things you can do to bring awareness to many teens about driving under the influence?

maks197457 [2]

Show them examples of what the outcomes may be and show them videos and pictures of what could happen to them.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers