Answer:
The law of demand states that all other things being equal, the quantity bought of a good or service is a function of price. As long as nothing else changes, people will buy less of something when its price rises. They'll buy more when its price falls.
During 1803, Napoleon Bonaparte, who was the French ruler at that time, controlled the Louisiana Territory. President Jefferson believed that the French leader may be a threat to American trade and travel, so he decided to negotiate the Louisiana purchase. By doing so, the US would be able to use the Mississippi River and the Port of New Orleans more freely; both ports had been used by farmers to ship their crops and get paid. Jefferson was able to buy the Louisiana territory from France, since Napoleon Bonaparte needed money for the Great French War. As a result, with the purchase of this new territory, the land area of America nearly doubled.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>postconventional</em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the term postconventional morality is described as one of the different levels in the theory of moral development which was proposed by one of the great psychologists named Lawrence Kohlberg. </em>
<em>According to Lawrence Kohlberg, </em><em>postconventional morality is the third and the highest level in the theory of moral development whereby an individual tends to develop his or her personal set of morals and ethics that he or she uses to carry out or led a specific behavior.</em>
<em>As per the question, Kohlberg would suggest that this illustrates the postconventional morality.</em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
Regulate interstate (between states) and international trade