Pittsburgh is located in the southwest of the state, at the confluence of the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio rivers. Pittsburgh is known both as "the Steel City" for its more than 300 steel-related businesses and as the "City of Bridges" for its 446 bridges.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
''The WBS provides a hierarchical structure that outlines the activities'' this statement is wrong about the work breakdown structure (WBS)
<u>Explanation:</u>
As clear from the name, work breakdown structure which is mostly used to manage projects of an organisation, is a way in which the project that is to be completed is divided into smaller components among the people of the team working on that project according to their capabilities to bring more efficiency in the project and to finish the project faster. It helps to identify the obstacles and risks related to the project in a better way.
Answer: They wanted to use their land for tobacco plantations.
The Natchez are a Native American people from the Lower Mississippi Valley. They spoke a language with no known close relatives, and are noted for being the only Mississippian culture with complex chiefdoms that survived into the colonization period. The Natchez were defeated by French forces around 1730. Today, most descendants of the Natchez live in Oklahoma and South Carolina.
Initially, contact between the Natchez and the Europeans was peaceful. French colonists intermarried with the Native Americans and the French were granted some lands to cultivate. French colonists imported African slaves and cultivated tobacco plants. During the 1710s and 1720s, however, several conflicts arose. These culminated in the French commander Sieur de Chepart's order to vacate the village in order to use the land for a tobacco plantation. This initiated the Natchez Revolt.
