Lymphocytes, this is the white blood cell that identifies these pathogens
<u>Answer:</u> The number of phosphorus atoms in given amount of copper(II) phosphate is 
<u>Explanation:</u>
We are given:
Moles of copper(II) phosphate 
= 7.00 mol
1 mole of copper(II) phosphate contains 3 moles of copper, 2 moles of phosphorus and 8 moles of oxygen atoms
Moles of phosphorus in copper(II) phosphate = 
According to the mole concept:
1 mole of a compound contains 
number of particles
So, 7.00 moles of copper(II) phosphate will contain = 
number of phosphorus atoms.
Hence, the number of phosphorus atoms in given amount of copper(II) phosphate is
Answer: Ions result from atoms or molecules that have gained or lost one or more valence electrons, giving them a positive or negative charge. Those with a negative charge are called anions and those with a positive charge are called cations. Cations (positively-charged ions) and anions (negatively-charged ions) are formed when a metal loses electrons, and a nonmetal gains those electrons. ... And all of them form an anion with a single negative charge. The VIA elements gain two electrons to form anions with a 2- charge.
hope this helps
You must add 45 mL of the 80 % alcohol to the 30 % alcohol to get a 35 % solution.
You can use a modified dilution formula to calculate the volume of 80 % alcohol
V1×C1 + V2×C2 = V3×C3
Let the volume of 80 % mixture 1 = <em>x</em> mL. Then the volume of the final 35 % mixture 3 = (405 + <em>x</em> ) mL
(<em>x</em> mL×80 % alc) + (405 mL×30 % alc) = (405 + <em>x</em>)mL × 35 % alc
80x + 12 150 = 14 175 + 35 x
45x = 2025
x = 2025/45 = 45
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
