It is to maintain order.... provide sercurity and i believe number one too
A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
Learn more about peer testimony at brainly.com/question/4214423
In health and social care, as a practicioner you're usually required to not disclose any information about your client openly to other people.
The only exemption here is when doing an super- or intervision with your peers, here you can "breach" this confidentiality with obviously still presenting this person as an anonymous case.
Another exemption is when you're given information that revolves around possible hurting other people or self-hurting coming from the client itself.
The practice in Medieval Europe was most similar to a Japanese warriors code of Bushido is chivalry. Chivalry is a code of conduct of the knighthood which was developed between 1170 and 1220. This came from the Roman Empire from the ideas of cavalryman.
Persia's standing army was an important factor in Persia's rapid growth because of the elite soldiers within the standing army. They were known as the "Immortals" and tasked to maintain order from within and the outside.
