The statement "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 was created to protect consumers against false advertising by monopolies." is false.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act placed the obligation of responsibility for a company's financial reporting squarely on the shoulders of its top executives in order to safeguard investors from corporate accounting fraud.
It required chief executive officers (CEOs) and chief financial officers (CFOs) to personally attest to the correctness of the information in financial reports and to affirm that controls and procedures were in place to evaluate and verify that accuracy.
In reality, CEOs and CFOs had to personally certify that financial reports complied with Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) rules by signing them. Failure to comply with this might result in fines of up to $15 million and 20-year prison terms.
Hence, the given statement is false.
Learn more about the Securities and Exchange Commission:
brainly.com/question/3798508
#SPJ1
Mr. Romeri's actions in deceiving Ms. Conley were legal and ethical --- this statement is FALSE. Deception is never legal nor ethical. Especially in this case where a man deceived a woman for his personal gain. This may be acquitted in some courts but normally this is not acceptable.
The answer to this question is <span>Company strengths and weaknesses.
In this context, company strength refers to all the factors that make the company stand out among other competitors in the market (such as good products, fame, good researchers, etc)
The weakness, on the other hand, refers to something that needed to be taken care of if the company want to win the competition in the market. (such as huge debt ratio, scandals, etc)
</span>
Answer:
collateralized debt obligation
Explanation:a
collateralized debt obligation is referred to an emergency asset that would be used as collateral assets if a company unable to pay the loan.
It is basically introduced by the bank to regain the loan value that is sold to particular investors. it helps the bank to make more funds and it also helps to transfer risk from bank to investor.
Answer:
Social media is a very good way of protesting because many many people go on social media sites and they can join in and instead of being abused by other people outside you can easily make a protest on video or a website.