When are jurors allowed to consider evidence? PLEASE ANSWERRRR FAST AND CORRECTLY WILL MARK BRAINLIESTTTT

Law

1 answer:

oksian1 [2.3K]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision. The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.

Explanation:

A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c). (b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.

You might be interested in

Explain Uniformity and Impartiality with Examples

Jlenok [28]

Answer:

I really don't know I just need points sorry.

4 0

4 years ago

If criminal behavior is learned, who taught the first criminal?

-BARSIC- [3]

Criminal behavior has been learned since the beginning of time so trust that it is a big cycle of learning from one ancestry to another to the present day. Although, not all criminal behavior is learned. In fact, some criminal behavior is caused by other factors including the labeling theory which states that one commits crimes simply due to them already being label as a criminal, so they conform to the beliefs and start to act out.

4 0

3 years ago

How does electricity get to our house?

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:The electrical charge goes through high-voltage transmission lines that stretch across the country. It reaches a substation, where the voltage is lowered so it can be sent on smaller power lines. ... The electricity travels through wires inside the walls to the outlets and switches all over your house.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Which historic court case determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation n

skelet666 [1.2K]

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a historic court case that determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers granted to them.

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the state of Maryland did not have the authority to levy taxes against the Second Bank of the United States. This was due to the fact that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 to construct the Bank.

With what is perhaps Chief Justice John Marshall's strongest decision, McCulloch rejected the extreme states' rights arguments made by counsel for Maryland in resounding language while simultaneously giving Congress vast discretionary ability to effectuate the enumerated powers.

This result gave rise to the idea of Congress' implied authority in the Constitution, which holds that Congress has powers beyond those expressly enumerated in the United States Constitution, including powers that may assist such authorities in carrying out those expressly enumerated in the Constitution.

Learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)- brainly.com/question/20593754

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is used to make a cast of a tool mark?

shepuryov [24]

D, All of the above
Explanation: that’s the answer

8 0

3 years ago